Events

Events

Talking Point

Analysis

Photo

Video

Islam

Links

Important

Chat

Archive

.

Language

English

Türkçe

Русский

Mirrors 

argun.org

dagestan.org

Mail

Hotmail

Yahoo

Dotexpres

UsaNet


Tuesday, 19, June 2001

More and more Russian doubt in Putin

Looking on the Russian army in Ichkeria resembles us movie “Wedding in Malinovka”.

Russian International Committee for “Stopping the war and peace settlement in Chechnya” sent an open appeal to embassies of Gerat Britain, Germany, Italy, Canada, USA, France and Japan. This appeal, which was addressed to the leaders of these countries, contains a call to undertake drastic measures to stop the war and massive violation of human rights in Chechnya, to overcome humanitarian catastrophe in North Caucasus, and to call Vladimir Putin to start peace negotiations with Aslan Maskhadov during July session in Genoa.

This appeal was promulgated on a press conference, which took place in Moscow’s Institute for development, on June 14.  Russian and English text of the open appeal addressed to the president of USA Gordz V. Bush and other materials were represented. Kovalev Sergei Adamovich, deputy of the State Duma of Russian Federation; Rybakov Yulii Andreevich, deputy of State Duma of Russian Federation; tkachenko Aleksandr Petrovich a General Secretary of Russian Pen-Center; writer, national actress of Chechen-Ingushetia, Honored Actress of Russian Federation and director of Center for Investigation and Popularization of Chechen culture “Lam” (Grozny) Zuleikhan Bagalova; Samodurov Yuri Vadimovich, Museum, Andrei Sakharov’s Public Center; Ponamarev Lev Aleksandrovich, All-Russian movement for “Human rights” spoke at the conference.

The main idea, which was stated on the press-conference, belonged to the deputy Sergei Kovalev: hypocritical politic of the West democracy leaders, which refuse to react in appropriate way on appalling human rights violations in Chechnya does not only make them accomplices of Kremlin’s criminal politic  but also threatens to finally depreciate standards of international low, and to return the world into epoch of uncovered triumph of cynicism Sergei Kovalev remarked that the war in Chechnya was initiated by the same group in Russian summit that selected the candidature of Vladimir Putin to succeed Yelcin.... Kremlin studiously ignores, and Maskhodov’s envoy that arrived to Moscow to organize negotiations with Yeltsin in July1999 was arrested.

In the opinion of Aleksandr Tkachenko only a person who started it, Vladimir Putin itself, can stop the war in Chechnya. The data of latest public opinion poll questioning (VCIOM) (end of May, beginning of June 2001) testify a growing tiredness and a feeling of hopelessness spreading in Russian society because of the war in Chechnya, Gudkov Lev Dmitreevichone of the VCIOM leaders reported to the agency “For human rights”. 

When summing up a regular questioning of 1600 respondents, the well-known Russian sociologist remarked that after “several month of relative a vagueness, which dominated in social opinion in autumn of the last year and present winter, number of those who support continuation of military actions constantly decreases and reached the smallest showings for the whole period of the war by June, 34% are “for” the war and 58% are against.

Moreover, the massif of those who found difficulty in replying is decreasing, people who were indifferent to politics or just incompetent, of little education. In next 2-3 month if any extraordinary events won’t happen (new terrorist act, intensification of bloody clashes between federal army and Chechen combatants) number of those who support peace negotiations will rise more for 7-10% and this can noticeably change social balance and the estimation of the situation.

In addition, realization of that the war is a deadlock and that nothing can be solved by force in this case, that only destruction and people murdering is behind, don’t grow into resentment agaist leadership of the country or to assertion of corresponding demands to the government (in relation to this, only 14% of questioned express their claims and indignation of armed actions).

Massive reactions bear more passive character, by reflecting a massive tendency to force out the problems of such kind from the mind, to not talk about them.  Today, realization of that the wave of fear and indignation, revenge and hope for strong and authoritative leader who is able to protect people from terrorists ended.  The realization that these hopes didn’t fulfilled that the war is useless and hopeless.

At the end of May 63% of questioned people consider that continuation of the war leads to depredates the army, demoralization of the society and to massive spreading of violence.  23% of the people have contrary opinion; this is a mass that is aggressively and irreconcilably mood on the war until victorious end; people who will demand to continue the military actions despite on any losses of the army and between civilians.  Among these are more supporters of “Unity”(Edinstvo) and LDPR than any other parties. 

From materials of agency “For human rights”

Kavkaz-Center

Back to top ^^



Also in this section: 

  Military operations, punitive
   actions and marauding

  Putin Says Russia Would
   Counter U.S. Shield

  More and more Russian
   doubt in Putin

  Explosions and crossfire
   continue

  "Normal relations will be
   developed with Russia …"

  Vakha Arsanov confirms
   the fact of destruction of
   Russian planes

  General-governors: a year
   later
  Bush views an ally in
   Russia
  Caucasians will resist
   against Moscow together

  Russians write to George
   Bush

  Two Russian planes were
   shot down

  Baltic States See NATO as
   Shield From Russia
  Police Killings of Israeli
   Arabs Being Questioned b
   y Inquiry

Events ] Talking Point ] Analysis ] Photo ] Video ] Islam ] Links ] Important ] Chat Archive


Copyright © 1999-2001.  "Kavkaz-Center"  News Agency
The reprint without prior permission is violation of international legislation of the Webmaster:
webmaster@kavkaz.org
The publication of authors may not coincide with ideas of edition of the site "Kavkaz-Center"